Ernest Ng

Call 2013 (HK)
Languages English , Cantonese , Mandarin
Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers earns recognition for his dual practice in commercial and public law, with a notable penchant for matters at the intersection of land use and public law. "He's a very good advocate and his demeanour in court is good. He has good sense in public law." "Ernest is very user-friendly, engaging, proactive, meticulous and value adding."
Chambers & Partners, 2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar, Administrative & Public Law
Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers wins recognition for advising on fraud disputes and recovery actions, as well as for his skill in securing injunctions. "Ernest is very user-friendly, engaging, proactive, meticulous and value adding." "His ability to address complicated issue in such a prompt way is impressive."
Chambers & Partners, 2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar, Commercial Dispute Resolution
'Ernest is highly versatile and at the same time approachable, and owing to his in-depth knowledge in the area, he is able to think out of the box and be proactive in exploring new approaches for clients. He is able to fight cases on his feet in a respectable manner irrespective of the merits of the cases taken.'
Legal 500, 2025 -2026, Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution, Leading Junior
Ernest was ranked in Tier 1 for Administrative & Public Law by the Legal 500, 2025-2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar. Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.
Legal 500, 2025 -2026, Greater China Region, HK Bar, Administrative & Public Law, Leading Junior, Tier 1
"Ernest is very approachable, hardworking and user-friendly. He thinks outside the box. In court, he is quick on his feet. He is a calm advocate who regularly punches above his weight. Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers wins recognition for advising on fraud disputes and recovery actions, as well as for his skill in securing injunctions."
Chambers & Partners 2025, Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution
“Ernest is an expert in the laws of equitable tracing and unjust enrichment. He was counsel in a number of landmark decisions about these developing areas of laws.”
Chambers and Partners 2024 Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution
“He is our number one go-to junior for injunction cases.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
“Very bright, hardworking and practical. The judges speak highly of his skills and advocacy”
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2025
"Ernest’s advocacy is of high quality; he is consistently assertive and powerful in making oral submissions; he stands out from the peers of his seniority as his legal knowledge, advocacy, tactics and client-care skills are very well-balanced."
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2023
"Ernest is confident and his advocacy is succinct and to the point. He knows the strengths and weaknesses of a case inside out and can present the arguments with force, he never shies away from urgent instructions, even with substantial amounts of documents, and he is extremely easy to work with."
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2024
“Ernest is hard-working, bright and very easy to work with. He is always up for complicated and urgent matters. His analysis and advice are both clear and incisive. He is also a good strategist.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
‘Ernest is a bright barrister who can always deliver thorough research and persuasive argument, both written and orally. He is knowledgeable in public law and his quality of work is unquestionable.’
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2024
“Ernest pinpoints the issues early on and deals with them swiftly. Clients have full confidence in his work and he can often provide solutions out of the box.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
“Ernest was really good to work with as he handled the issues appropriately and quickly.”
Chambers and Partners 2024

Ernest Ng

Call
2013 (HK)
Languages
English , Cantonese , Mandarin
Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers earns recognition for his dual practice in commercial and public law, with a notable penchant for matters at the intersection of land use and public law. "He's a very good advocate and his demeanour in court is good. He has good sense in public law." "Ernest is very user-friendly, engaging, proactive, meticulous and value adding."
Chambers & Partners, 2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar, Administrative & Public Law
Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers wins recognition for advising on fraud disputes and recovery actions, as well as for his skill in securing injunctions. "Ernest is very user-friendly, engaging, proactive, meticulous and value adding." "His ability to address complicated issue in such a prompt way is impressive."
Chambers & Partners, 2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar, Commercial Dispute Resolution
'Ernest is highly versatile and at the same time approachable, and owing to his in-depth knowledge in the area, he is able to think out of the box and be proactive in exploring new approaches for clients. He is able to fight cases on his feet in a respectable manner irrespective of the merits of the cases taken.'
Legal 500, 2025 -2026, Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution, Leading Junior
Ernest was ranked in Tier 1 for Administrative & Public Law by the Legal 500, 2025-2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar. Leading juniors are those with significant experience of key cases, strong market recognition from both peers and clients, and are seen as future candidates for silk.
Legal 500, 2025 -2026, Greater China Region, HK Bar, Administrative & Public Law, Leading Junior, Tier 1
"Ernest is very approachable, hardworking and user-friendly. He thinks outside the box. In court, he is quick on his feet. He is a calm advocate who regularly punches above his weight. Ernest Ng of Parkside Chambers wins recognition for advising on fraud disputes and recovery actions, as well as for his skill in securing injunctions."
Chambers & Partners 2025, Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution
“Ernest is an expert in the laws of equitable tracing and unjust enrichment. He was counsel in a number of landmark decisions about these developing areas of laws.”
Chambers and Partners 2024 Greater China Region, HK Bar - Commercial Dispute Resolution
“He is our number one go-to junior for injunction cases.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
“Very bright, hardworking and practical. The judges speak highly of his skills and advocacy”
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2025
"Ernest’s advocacy is of high quality; he is consistently assertive and powerful in making oral submissions; he stands out from the peers of his seniority as his legal knowledge, advocacy, tactics and client-care skills are very well-balanced."
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2023
"Ernest is confident and his advocacy is succinct and to the point. He knows the strengths and weaknesses of a case inside out and can present the arguments with force, he never shies away from urgent instructions, even with substantial amounts of documents, and he is extremely easy to work with."
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2024
“Ernest is hard-working, bright and very easy to work with. He is always up for complicated and urgent matters. His analysis and advice are both clear and incisive. He is also a good strategist.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
‘Ernest is a bright barrister who can always deliver thorough research and persuasive argument, both written and orally. He is knowledgeable in public law and his quality of work is unquestionable.’
Legal 500 Hong Kong Bar 2024
“Ernest pinpoints the issues early on and deals with them swiftly. Clients have full confidence in his work and he can often provide solutions out of the box.”
Chambers and Partners 2024
“Ernest was really good to work with as he handled the issues appropriately and quickly.”
Chambers and Partners 2024

Overview

Ernest has developed a successful practice which focuses on civil, public law and regulatory matters. He has appeared at all levels of Courts in Hong Kong and in administrative tribunals, including the Inland Revenue Board of Review and the Market Misconduct Tribunal. He has been consistently recognised as a leading junior across major directories including Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, Doyles' Guide and Lexology.

In the context of commercial and company disputes, Ernest is a formidable advocate, known for his adept handling of complex litigation, particularly for asset recovery stemming from fraud and other misconduct. His strategic acumen, technical expertise and dedication to his clients have consistently yielded favourable outcomes contributing to his robust track record of success.

Ernest has a deep bench of niche experience in public law, navigating constitutional and human rights issues, town planning controversies, environmental concerns, taxation matters, and regulatory and disciplinary issues with precision and finesse. His versatility extends to advising on public international law matters, where his nuanced understanding and astute guidance have proven invaluable to clients, particularly in the context of complex global challenges.

Prior to joining the Bar, Ernest read social sciences and law at the University of Hong Kong with an emphasis on international relations and public international law. He received his Master of Laws (International Law) with Class I Honours from the University of Cambridge under the supervision of Prof. James Crawford S.C. on the strength of his study in international constitutional law. His dedication to public law and international relations was also evinced by his work at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in The Hague with HH Judge Liu when he was an intern there, and contributed to several landmark decisions which shaped international jurisprudence.

Ernest is experienced in assisting worldwide clients to recover assets lost as a result of fraud or other reasons, in particular by obtaining injunctive relief in Hong Kong, including those in aid of foreign actions or arbitrations.  On the other hand, Ernest has maintained a balanced representation, having acted also for the recipients of alleged fraud proceeds. “[Ernest] wins recognition for advising on fraud disputes and recovery actions, as well as for his skill in securing injunctions.” – Chambers and Partners 2024. 

Highlighted Cases
  • The Yerrid Law Firm v Qianbaizi Trading Ltd CACV 170 & 331/2021

    Acted for a United States law firm in its recovery action which engages the question of illegal acts in the recipient’s reliance on the defence of ministerial receipt

  • Pacific Rainbow International Inc v Shenzhen Wolverine Tech Ltd HCA 3023/2016

    Acted for a corporate victim of fraud in the trial on proprietary claim and unjust enrichment against multiple layers’ recipients. 

  • XY, LLC v Jesse Zhu HCA 3039/2016

    Acted for the Plaintiff, a well known sex selection technology company in the United States, in its recovery action in aid of its action in Canada for over C$8.5 million against a number of wrongdoers in Hong Kong.

  • B.R. CAT International Co Ltd v HK Proof Import and Export Trading Co Ltd  HCA 1023/2014 & CACV 182/2017

    Acted for a major contracting and trading group of companies in Middle East and Africa in its recovery action in Hong Kong, which led to one of the first trials.  Also successfully assisted the company to intervene in competing victim’s recovery action to safeguard its interest, resulting in one of the first decisions on tracing into multi-currencies account.

Other Cases

Other Highlights Recovery Cases

  • Amidas Hog Kong Ltd v Che Si Ltd HCA 1406/2024 – Acted for a corporate victim.  The High Court conducted a comprehensive discussion as to proper enforcement procedures of fraud cases between Vesting Order, Execution Order and Garnishee Order.
  • LTC (BVI) Ltd v Tempest Storm Co Ltd HCA 535/2022 – Acted for a London Club in its recovery action, in which the Court confirmed that the law does not require the victim to conduct reasonable enquiry as to the fraud in an action for unjust enrichment.
  • DVA Agro GmbH v Universal Hope International Ltd HCA 284/2021 Acted for recipient of monies alleged to be proceeds of fraud in discharging injunction obtained against it
  • RPB SA v Xinwangyi Trade Ltd HCA 150 & 399/2020 – Acted for an Argentinian corporation in its recovery action raising important issues concerning rules of tracing through multiple layers of recipients.
  • Holy AG v BMW Ltd HCA 297/2020 – Acted for a German corporation in its recovery action raising important clarification as to requirements of the defence of bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
  • R Stahl Inc v AJ Development Ltd HCA 1412/2019 – Acted for an American corporation in its recovery action in Hong Kong which confirmed for the first time at the appellate level that the “fraud exception” under the old summary judgment procedure was not engaged.
  • Junson Development International Ltd v ZFT Trading Co Ltd HCA 1680 & 1781/2019 – Acted for a Hong Kong investment group in its local recovery actions involving four layers of recipients.

Other Recovery Cases

  • ZJ v CWF HCMP 745/2023 – Acted for a party to foreign divorce proceedings to seize assets in Hong Kong for further tracing into foreign assets.
  • Dobkin v Huaada (HK) Ltd HCA 1107/2021; DCCJ 1733/2022
  • Solyda SRL v Wu HCA 161/2019
  • Zhongshan Weitemei Electronic Technolgy Co Ltd v VTBeauty Ltd HCA 970/2019
  • Heuft Ltd v Yun Tongda Electronic Commerce Ltd HCA 1066/2019
  • Asia Advisors Ltd v HK Bsin Yu Trading Co Ltd HCA 846/2019
  • South American International Bank Curacao NV v Ying Xin Trading Co Ltd HCA 3012/2018
  • Alkind v Alon Business Consultancy Ltd HCA 1257/2018
  • Banco Del Austra SA v Regal Prosper Trading Ltd HCA 477/2015
  • Acted for the recipients of alleged fraud proceeds: Wang v Pan HCA 590/2023; Dream International Ltd v Great Treasure (HK) Trading Ltd HCA 240/2022; Opera National de Paris v Sun Bon International Logistics Ltd DCCJ 218/2021; Food Freshly AFC GmbH v KSharp International Trade Ltd DCCJ 6897/2019; Cheung v Hang Seng Bank v Hong Kong Pawer Trading Ltd & Ors HCA 3002/2018.

Ernest is both a strategic advisor and skilled advocate to both private and public bodies and has experience in handling high profile and complex judicial review and public law matters, notably including infrastructure projects such as the Third Runway of the Hong Kong International Airport and the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link.  He has also frequently acted for clients in challenging the issuance of warrants and applying for urgent injunctive relief. 

Highlighted Cases
  • Kwok Cheuk Kin v Secretary for Justice CACV 8, 10, 87, 88/2019

    Judicial review on the constitutionality of the Co-Location Arrangement at the West Kowloon Station for the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link.

  • Chan Ki Kau v Hong Kong Police Force HCAL 1747, 1753, 2671, 2703/2019

    Judicial review on whether officers of the Hong Kong Police Force, including anti-riot police officers and the Special Tactical Contingent, also known as the “Raptors”, are required to display their unique identification numbers or other distinctive identification numbers or marks when carrying out non-covert duties.

  • Miu Hon Kit v The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Ltd HCAL 496/2019

    Judicial review in respect of disciplinary proceedings before the Listing Appeals Committee of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

  • Ho Loy v Director of Environmental Protection HCAL 21/2015

    Judicial review on the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Third Runway of the Hong Kong International Airport.

Other Cases

Constitution Law

  • Kwok v President of the Legislative Council CACV 320/2019 – Judicial review on the quorum of the Committee of the Whole Council of the Legislative Council.
  • Leung v Chief Secretary for Administration HCAL 31/2015 – Judicial review on the consultation on the selection of Chief Executive and interpretation of the “831” NPCSC Decision.
  • Benver Company Ltd v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) HCAL 217/2023 – Constitutional challenge of Appeal Tribunal’s procedural decisions.

Regulatory

  • SFC v Cheng FAMV 125/2018 – Acted for the Specified Person in the MMT proceedings and appeals in respect of insider dealing in the shares of a listed company in Hong Kong, which engaged the question of burden of proof in an inquisitorial tribunal.
  • SFC v CL Management Services FAMC 34/2016 – ‘holding out’ offence under s. 114 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance
  • A v SFC HCAL 29, 31, 33/2014– Judicial review concerning privileges against self-incrimination in parallel proceedings (Criminal and the Takeovers Panel)

Environment

  • Tse v Director of Environmental Protection HCAL 1256/2024 – Judicial Review in respect of the Environmental Impact Assessment of the San Tin Technopole, in which the High Court rendered landmark decision on substitution of applicant
  • Cheung v Chief Executive in Council HCAL 177/2015 – Judicial review in respect of roadwork at the Castle Peak Road and environmental impact assessment under the Road (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance

Education

  • Lantau International School Ltd v Secretary for Education HCAL 1143/2021 – Judicial review against decision not to give support to an international school to develop a new secondary school in the Lantau Island

Buildings / Housing

  • Chui v Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) CACV 291/2022– Judicial review against decision to serve a building order to a particular owner in a multi-storey building.
  • Kone Elevator (HK) Ltd v Construction Industry Council DCMP 4552/2022 – First appeal against a levy decision by the Construction Industry Council.
  • Tomorrow Finances Ltd v Director of Fire Services CACV 15/2020 – Judicial review against fire Hazards Abatement Notices issued against operators of mini-storage facility.
  • Chow v Housing Authority HCAL 2480/2019 – Judicial review concerning the Appeal Tribunal’s duty to give reasons.
  • Deng v Housing Authority HCAL 4/2017 – Judicial review concerning the Appeal Tribunal’s Tameside duty / reasonableness of decision.

Inland Revenue

  • CAC International Ltd v CIR HCIA 4/2022 – Acted for the CIR in a dispute concerning intention to trade in respect of multiple luxurious properties in Hong Kong
  • Touax Container Investment Ltd v CIR HCIA 1/2023 – Acted for the CIR in a dispute concerning sources of profit of an international shipping group’s branch office in Hong Kong.
  • Case No. D4/17 (2018-19) IRBRD 96 – Board of Review hearing concerning reference to third party statements after the assessment & whether assessment excessive by reason of an “omission”.
  • Case No. D16/20 (2021-22) IRBRD 163 – Board of Review hearing concerning whether acquisition or the subsequent disposal of a real property amounted to “trade”.

Immigration

  • ST v Betty Kwan CACV 115/2013 (CA) – Judicial review for oral hearings in the adjudication of torture claims.
  • Other cases concerning torture claimants: KN HCAL 1711/2019; M HCAL 170/2016; W HCAL 218/2015; S HCAL 115/2014; A HCAL 127/2014

Police

  • Kwok v Commissioner of Police HCAL 55/2017 – Judicial review as to the meaning ‘Public meeting’ under the Public Order Ordinance.  The decision also touched upon the question of locus stand of an applicant.
  • Chan v Commissioner of Police HCAL 181/2013 – Judicial review against search warrants against firm of solicitors which also engages the question of legal professional privilege

Professional

  • Re a Barrister (159/14) HCAL 159/2014 – Acted for the Bar Council to challenge decision of a Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal on question of flagrant incompetence of counsel and scope of counsel immunity.
  • Re Mably CACV 173/2018 – Acted for the Bar Council to oppose ad hoc admission of overseas junior counsel.

Election

  • Lo v Secretary for Justice HCMP 662/2020
  • Chow v Secretary for Justice HCMP 1050/2021

Ernest has extensive experience in handling commercial disputes, particularly where cross-border or international elements are involved. These matrices demand an aptitude for dealing with novel and nuanced issues and lateral thinking and astute problem solving skills. Ernest is a tactical advisor to his clients at the initial stages and also adept at being a frontline advocate when matters are referred to Court, whether urgently, for injunctive relief or for trial.

 

Highlighted Cases
  • Agency for Policy Coordination on State Property v Batbold Sukhbaatar HCMP 2153/2020

    Striking out proceedings against former Mongolian Prime Minister Batbold in relation to the Erdenet Mine in Mongolia.

  • Agritrade Resources Ltd v Ashok Kumar Sahoo HCA 1660/2020

    Acting for former CFO and ED against listed company’s action claiming breach of duties in relation a power plant project in India in which P’s group invested US$123.1 million.

  • Chan Kon Fong v Gallop Pioneer Ltd HCA 1357/2011

    Acted for the Plaintiff in claims, valued at AUD 26 million, relating to an indirect acquisition in interest in a Tin mines in Renison in Tasmania with a multi-layered corporate structure involving participants (now defendants) such as Yunnan Tin Group’s (Colde: SHE 960) companies.

  • Re Masterveyor Holdings Ltd, HCMP 2054/2021 & HCA 859/2021

    A series of interlocutory applications, including injunctions, to restrain disposal of shares and/or use of funds in subsidiary’s account against the context of a series of actions in relation to the majority stake in Steering Holdings Limited (Stock Code 1826)

Other Cases
  • China Everbright Bank v China Kingho Energy Group Ltd HCA 809/2024 – Acted for parties in resisting injunction in aid of action to enforce a Mainland conciliatory statement in common law, which engages issue of the scope of the Mainland Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance (Cap 579).
  • China Industrial Securities International Brokerage Ltd v Lou HCA 1073/2021 – Acted for agents in a dispute between security broker company and its agents concerning fairness in contract between them.
  • Perpetual Wealth (Hong Kong) Ltd v BE Solutions Co Ltd HCCT 42/2021 – Acted for building contractors in a dispute concerning a project in Rykadan Capital Tower, against allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud.
  • Tsui & Wong, the Joint and Several Liquidators of HMV Marketing Ltd v Panorama Corporation HCMP 784/2020 – Defending allegation of unfair preference, misfeasance, breach of duties and breach of trust in the liquidation of the HMV retail and online stores operator.
  • Kader Industrial Co Ltd v Hop Shing Engineering & Construction Co Ltd HCCT 73 of 2020 – Acted for the building contractors in a dispute concerning waterproofing work at the rooftop of a multi-storey commercial building.
  • Au v End User Technology Ltd CACV 237/2017– Trial and appeal on sale of shares of a listed company in Hong Kong.
  • China Rail Investment Group (Hong Kong) v Eternity Profit Investment HCA 701/2013 – Acted for the listed company defending dispute in relation railway investments in the PRC with a claim sum of HK$100 million and further damages.
  • Recent selected injunction matters: HCA 1827/2024 (injunction for mandatory repair order and indemnity); HCA 1458/2023 (Application for Injunction concerning dispute on vessel investment agreements); HCA 809/2023 (injunction re shares of a Listco); HCMP 337/2023 (Injunction to act on company resolution); HCMP 298/2022 (injunction re the asset of an Mainland China artist in Hong Kong); HCA 284/2021 (discharge of injunction concerning alleged commercial fraud).
Selected Cases

Court Actions

  • G v A (2024) – Application for mandatory injunction in aid of arbitration concerning international sale of goods disputes.
  • A v B, B and Company A (2023) – Application for injunction and receivers in aid of arbitration concerning dispute on vessel investment agreements.
  • L v A (2023) – Acted for the respondent to resist application to set aside Award in relation to a charterparty dispute.
  • T v C (2022) – Application for Injunction in aid of arbitration concerning dispute on artiste agreements in Mainland China
  • KZ v KY HCCT 41/2019 – Acted for the applicant in resisting application to set aside enforcement of a Mainland arbitration award.
  • HZ Capital International Ltd v China Vocational Education Co Ltd HCCT 48/2016 – Acted for the investors in applying to set aside a Hong Kong arbitration award concerning an investment dispute in tertiary education in Mainland China.
  • Re Lucky Resources (HK) Ltd HCCW 89/2016 – Acted for the respondent to resist application for winding up, which engaged the question whether presentation of winding up petition constitute enforcement of an arbitration award.
  • Neo-Intelligence Holdings v Giant Crown Industries Ltd HCA 1127/2017 – Application for stay in favour of arbitration.

Arbitrations

  • HKIAC Rules (2024) – International sale of goods disputes.
  • HKIAC Rules (2020) – Ownership dispute as to coal mines in Mainland China.
  • HKIAC Rules (2020) – Disputes in relation to biomedical business operating in Mainland China, Korea and Japan etc.

Ernest is experienced in handling property disputes in particular those involving title disputes, boundary disputes, trespass and especially claims for adverse possession.

Selected Cases
  • Li v China Mobile Hong Kong Ltd DCCJ 617/2017; CAMP 344/2023 – Acted for China Mobile Hong Kong in defending against alleged trespass by antenna system built on houses in New Territories.
  • Kong v IO of Tai Wai Glamour Garden CACV 455/2018 – Acted for owners in action against incorporated owners in respect of external wall and breach of duties.
  • Kowloon Development Finance Ltd v Chan DCCJ 4650/2020 – Acted for occupiers in striking out writ of possession enforcement proceedings.
  • Adverse possession of agricultural lands: Siu v Teng DCCJ 2388/2017; Workwise Corporation v Ngai DCMP 1067/2018; Chan v Chau DCCJ 3943/2016 etc.
  • Adverse possession of urban lands: Lau v IO of Kiu Yu and Kiu Fat Mansion DCCJ 4753/2014; Chiu v IO of Kiu Yu and Kiu Fat Mansion DCCJ 5071/2014; Ho v IO of Kiu Yu and Kiu Fat Mansion DCCJ 2116/2015; U Po Chu v Tsang DCMP 467/2013; Chan v IO of Wing Hong Factory Building DCCJ 1736/2014 etc.
  • Adverse possession involving waters: Siu v Teng DCCJ 2388/2017.
  • Adverse possession involving airspace: Tang v Youngfield Limited CACV 329/2018.

2012

LL.M. (International Law) (1st Cl.), University of Cambridge

​​2011

P.C.LL., University of Hong Kong

2009

LL.B., University of Hong Kong

2007

B.Soc.Sc (Gov’t & Laws) (1st Cl.), University of Hong Kong

  • Member, Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (MCIArb) 

 

  • Legal 500 Asia Pacific Hong Kong Bar 2023 (Commercial Dispute Resolution; Administrative and Public Law)
  • Legal 500 Asia Pacific Hong Kong Bar 2024 (Commercial Dispute Resolution; Administrative and Public Law)
  • Legal 500 Asia Pacific Hong Kong Bar 2025 (Commercial Dispute Resolution; Administrative and Public Law)
  • Legal 500 Asia Pacific Hong Kong Bar 202 (Commercial Dispute Resolution; Administrative and Public Law)
  • Chambers & Partners Greater China Region 2024 Commercial Dispute Resolution: The Bar
  • Chambers & Partners Greater China Region 2025 Commercial Dispute Resolution: The Bar
  • Chambers & Partners Greater China Region 2026 Commercial Dispute Resolution: The Bar & Administrative and Public Law: The Bar
  • Doyles’ Guide Leading Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution Junior Counsel – Hong Kong, 2026
  • Lexology Index 2026 on Asset Recovery: Recommended Barrister (Hong Kong)

Professional appointments

  • Torture Claims Appeal Board, Member (2025-2026)
  • Hong Kong Bar Association, International Laws Committee (Member: 2016 – Present; Chairman: 2021 – Present)
  • Hong Kong Bar Association, Constitutional Affairs and Human Rights Committee (2012 – 2022)
  • Hong Kong Bar Association, Young Barristers Committee (2012 – 2017)
  • Hong Kong Bar Association, Executive Council (2013 – 2015)

Academic appointments

  • University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, Lecturer (Public International Law) (2015-2019); (Administrative Law) (2018-Present)
  • University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law, Tutor (Administrative Law) (2015-Present); (Constitutional Law) (2018-2019); (International Humanitarian Law Moot) (2014-Present)

  • Bar Scholarship (2012)
  • Charles Ching Scholarship (2012)
  • Elizabeth Mabel Burnett Prize, Hughes Hall College, University of Cambridge (2012)
  • Sir Richard May Trust Fund (2010)

  • Hong Kong Civil Procedure (2016 – Present) (Contributor)
  • The Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong (Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571)) (2020 – 2024) (Contributor)
  • Butterworths Hong Kong Securities Law Handbook (7th ed., 2022) (Contributor)
  • Halsbury’s Laws of Hong Kong (Vol. 44, 2023 ed.) “Rating”

Ernest Updates

Cases Aug 19, 2026
High Court enters summary judgment against illegality defence post-Wong Chi Hung
News Aug 4, 2026
6 of Parkside’s members recognised for Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution by the Doyle’s Guide 2026
Cases Civil Jul 24, 2026
Court sets out guidance on how to comply with a director inspection order
News Jul 14, 2026
Ernest Ng and Toby Brown recognized by Lexology Index for Asset Recovery
News Jun 3, 2026
The Butterworths Hong Kong Securities Law Handbook (8th Edition) has been published by LexisNexis Hong Kong...
Cases Civil Jun 2, 2026
The High Court allows Plaintiff’s claim for distribution from an estate, as the first case in...
Cases Civil May 11, 2026
Legal issues arising from a water leakage case
Cases Civil Mar 23, 2026
CFI granted Interim Injunction against Director of Lands to restrain him from obtaining possession of two...
News Feb 16, 2026
Strong representation by Parkside members in the latest Chambers & Partners, Global Guide 2026
News Jan 16, 2026
Parkside’s latest rankings in Chambers & Partners, 2026, Greater China, Hong Kong Bar
News Nov 19, 2025
Latest Legal 500 Rankings 2026 featuring 22 members from Parkside
Cases Civil Jul 4, 2025
High Court grants leave for Company to participate in Unfair Prejudice Petition
Cases Civil Jun 4, 2025
Enforcement of Non-Compete Against Former Employee Who Set Up Rival Business
News May 20, 2025
CPD Seminar at Charles Russell Speechlys on Cross Border Enforcement in Private Wealth Planning featuring Ernest...
Cases Civil Mar 26, 2025
High Court provides guidance on enforcing proprietary rights in identity fraud cases
News Jan 16, 2025
A strong showing and a new debut for Parkside in Chambers & Partners – Greater China...
News Sep 9, 2024
“Asset Recovery, From Injunction to Enforcement”: a webinar presented by Ernest Ng
Cases Civil Aug 26, 2024
KZ v KY [2024] HKCFI 1880 – Arbitral award enforced where there is no good reason...
News Jan 18, 2024
Strong showing for Parkside Chambers in latest Chambers & Partners Rankings – 2024
Cases Civil Dec 5, 2023
Court decided for the first time an appeal against the Construction Industry Council
News Nov 17, 2023
Parkside Chambers’ Legal 500 2024 Rankings
News Nov 8, 2023
Life at the Bar – Parkside Chambers
News Nov 6, 2023
Ernest Ng and Toby Brown shared their insights and conducted an in-depth analysis on “Asset Recovery...
News Aug 18, 2023
Ernest Ng was invited to share his practical experience on Judicial Review
News Aug 16, 2023
Ernest Ng and Jeremy Yau were invited to share their practical experience on Injunction and Asset...
Cases Civil Jul 6, 2023
Yerrid Law Firm – the impact of illegality on restitutionary defences
Cases Civil Jun 9, 2023
China Mobile Hong Kong successfully defended against claims of trespass, breach of s.34I BMO and nuisance