陈芷蓉

认许 2014(香港)
语言 英文 , 粤语 , 普通话 , 西班牙语
'Lareina is a very thorough and tough barrister. She is not afraid of fighting hard for clients in court and trying out some of the more challenging and creative arguments.'
2025年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單
'Lareina is a person who looks into the details of each and every fact of the case and she is good at meeting the tight deadlines of demanding clients. The quality of her work has improved a lot over the years and her native English has made her stand out when she makes submissions in court.'
2024年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單

陈芷蓉

认许
2014(香港)
语言
英文 , 粤语 , 普通话 , 西班牙语
'Lareina is a very thorough and tough barrister. She is not afraid of fighting hard for clients in court and trying out some of the more challenging and creative arguments.'
2025年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單
'Lareina is a person who looks into the details of each and every fact of the case and she is good at meeting the tight deadlines of demanding clients. The quality of her work has improved a lot over the years and her native English has made her stand out when she makes submissions in court.'
2024年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單

简介

陈大律师就家事婚姻法,民事法和白领罪案都有很强的专业经验。她曾以讼辩大律师身份,单独或作为次席大律师,在上诉庭、原讼庭、区域法院或家事法庭以及裁判法院进行讼辩。

陈大律师在婚姻及家事讼辩各方面都有丰富的经验。她亦经常在家事财产申索事宜和子女争议事项作出广泛和实用的法律意见,这包括附属济助诉讼程序(涵盖虚拟货币),第三者权益,改变居留地的申请,就子女的抚养/照顾及管教的安排,强制行动及初级侦讯等等。

从2017年开始,陈大律师成为香港家庭法律协会(HKFLA)的执行委员会的成员。她亦是香港大律师公会家事法专业委员会的成员。

陈大律师亦有幸被2024年度Legal 500《法律500强》视为在家事法及个体客户事项其中一名杰出的次席大律师。

在其他民事法的范畴中,陈大律师有其认可的经验,特别在涉及私人客户的事项,她就广泛的法律议题提供意见,这包括精神健康程序,遗嘱及遗产管理,知识产权,涉及虚拟货币/比特币的案件,医疗疏忽,土地法,公司股权纷争及其他涉及公司和商务事宜。

在刑事案件中,陈大律师亦处理不少复杂的白领罪案,包括涉及证劵及期货事务监察委员会(SFC),廉政公署(ICAC),金融科技(FinTech)及虚拟货币财务罪行的案件。

在其他范畴,陈大律师除间中在香港大学辅导班授课外,她亦是香港讼辩培训学会(HKATC)其中一名讼辩督导员,负责见习大律师的讼辩培训。

案件选例
  • MMP v. MMGA (FCMC 751/2018) – 10-day ancillary relief Trial in a long marriage of approx. 22 years involving assets of around HK$1.1 billion, add-backs in relation to ~US$4.5 million (~HK$35 million) in marital assets transferred to a girlfriend/new partner, serious illnesses suffered by both children requiring significant medical expenses / medical insurance and specialist treatment, including arguments as to post-separation accruals, conduct (marital, financial and litigation conduct), adverse inferences from financial disclosure, redaction of documents, relevant dates of valuations of assets, co-mingling of assets, liquidity / illiquidity of assets and undisclosed significant investments post-Trial.
  • RPB (nee RGP) v. CFB (FCMC 13240/2019) – 5-day ancillary relief Trial with an interlocutory litigation funding application in the context of assets in the Philippines and Texas, USA, including arguments as to ringfencing pre-marital assets, post-separation / non-matrimonial assets, liquidity / illiquidity of assets, a discount for lack of marketability of assets, passive economic growth / passive income on investments and a discount for minority interests, in the context of inter alia a US Qualified Domestic Relations Order to a US 401(k) pension, US tax SJE evidence, SJE evidence from a Philippines lawyer, a minority interest in an LLC which owns a plot of land, a 50% share in a plot of land purchased using inheritance monies, inherited investment accounts.
  • LSN v. LCM (FCMC 3810/2021) – ancillary relief application involving volatile crypto-assets representing a significant proportion of the matrimonial assets (at one point as high as 70%, with a then-valuation of over HK$13 million) and other investments in stocks/shares and options including arguments as to valuations of cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets, the relevant dates of valuations, varying risk appetites, financial disclosure and adverse inferences.
  • DAP v. WPYC (FCMP 167/2020) – 4-day Trial on children matters in relation to a child born out of wedlock, under the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap 13), including SJE evidence from a Child Psychologist on inter alia access and overnight access, an urgent variation/stay application, the introduction of a new partner (and subsequent marriage) to the child, and principles as to access arrangements for young children, infants and toddlers.
  • LYYC v. CHL and CSMS, the Executrices of the Estate of CGSK also known as CSKG, Deceased (HCMP 683/2021) [2022] HKCFI 1431 – resisting an application in the context of litigation funding under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance (Cap 481), including arguments as to the distinction between section 3 of the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (Cap 192) and section 7 of Cap 481, res judicata and interim lump sum orders.
  • WLK by her next friend MYW v. CCIW & Ors. (FCMP 176/2019) – application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance (Cap 481) by the Applicant mother who is a mentally-incapacitated person, including a litigation funding application, against her 10 children in relation to the estate of their deceased father / the Applicant’s late husband.
  • CK v. ZH (FCMP 8/2023) – successful urgent injunction application with an authorisation of arrest pursuant to the Domestic and Cohabitation Relationships Violence Ordinance (Cap 189) against the mother/grandmother of the Applicant, and subsequent arrest due to a breach of the Injunction Order.
  • IS v. BLL (FCMP 98/2023) – in relation to an intended relocation to South Africa and/or permission to continue to reside in Hong Kong, parallel proceedings in New York, including arguments as to jurisdiction and forum non conveniens.
  • CWK v. LYW (FCMC 2019/2023) – urgent application for variation / suspension of access, return of the parties’ child and allegations of child abuse.
案件选例
  • Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Health Ltd. & Reckitt Benckiser Hong Kong v. WHealthfields (Hong Kong) Ltd. (HCIP 2/2022) – resisting an application for summary judgment in the context of Dettol and Walch hygiene products / fast-moving consumer goods, in the context of a claim for copyright infringement and passing off.
  • K11 Group Limited & Ors v. Ouji Sekken (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. (HCIP 73/2022) – resisting a claim of passing off by the K11 Group / K11 MUSEA, a subsidiary of the New World Development Group, in the context of body wash products sold under the “KHO” brand.

2013

香港大学法学专业证书

2012

香港大学法学士

  • 陈大律师亦有幸被2024年度Legal 500 《法律500强》视为在家事法及个体客户事项其中一名杰出的大律师。

  • 香港大学法律专业学系法学专业证书民事讼辩讲师(小组导修)(2019至今)
  • 香港大律师公会家事法委员会委员(2019年3月至今)
  • 香港大律师公会法律教育及专业进修常委会委员(2019年3月至今)
  • 香港女律师协会成员(2018年11月至今)
  • 香港大律师公会执业发展常委会委员(2018年6月至今)
  • Hong Kong Advocacy Training Council 讼辩导师(2018年1月至今)
  • 香港家庭法律协会执行委员会成员(2017年11月至今)(自2015为成员)
  • 香港大律师公会新晋大律师常委会副主席(2017年3月至2019年2月)
  • 香港大律师公会新晋大律师常委会秘书(2016年3月至2017年3月)
  • 香港大律师公会执委会委员(谭允芝资深大律师为主席)(2016年1月至2017年1月)
  • 香港大律师公会持续专业发展工作小组成员(2015年10月至2017年1月)
  • 香港大律师公会行为守则及注册外地律师于香港提供法律意见及执业工作小组成员(2015年10月至2017年1月)
  • Hong Kong Competition Association成员(2015至今)
  • Middle Temple Society in Hong Kong 成员(2015至今)
  • 香港大律师公会福利及康体常委会委员(2015至2018)

  • Middle Temple讼辩培训奖学金(英国伦敦)(2015)

  • 演讲者,“不稳定且有风险的婚姻资产:应对价值波动和风险偏好变化的策略”,何敦律师行(2023 年 12 月 8 日)
  • 演讲者,“家庭执法:除非命令”,古明慧律师行(2023 年 2 月 24 日)
  • 演讲者,“跨境相互执行婚姻和家庭案件”,何韦律师行(2022 年 11 月 16 日)
  • 演讲者,“婚姻诉讼中的加密货币和加密资产”,古明慧律师行(2022 年 6 月 24 日)
  • 特约作者,《Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong-汇票条例》(第 19 章),LexisNexis(2022 年 9 月至今)
  • 演讲者,“打破(区块)链:离婚与加密资产”,思雅仕律师行和普华永道(2022 年 2 月 17 日)
  • 演讲者,香港大律师公会家事法委员会“远距听证会与虚拟罗斯福”(2021年7月)
  • 演讲者,香港大律师公会家事法委员会,“家庭法实务与程序:首次约见”(2019年9月)
  • 演讲者,香港大律师公会家事法委员会“家事法程序:家庭暴力”(2019年6月)
  • 特约作者,LexisNexis 实用指南 – 私人客户(附属济助)(2019 年 3 月至今)
  • 演讲者,“可以直接延聘大律师就税务问题提供法律意见吗?大律师和税务从业人员之间如何最好地合作?”(香港税务学会主办)(2018年12月)
  • 演讲者,“具争讼性的遗嘱认证和遗产管理的热门问题”(2017 年 9 月)
  • 演讲者,“香港的众筹及其监管:惯性空间?”2015年贸易法委员会新兴会议(2017年8月发布)(2015年11月)

陈芷蓉更新

最新消息 2025 年 11 月 19 日
Latest Legal 500...
最新消息 2025 年 4 月 2 日
Latest DoyleR...
最新消息 2025 年 1 月 16 日
A strong showing...
案例选例 民事 2024 年 7 月 12 日
退休金,婚前地块,及菲律宾物业:...
民事 最新消息 2024 年 5 月 3 日
柏承大律师事务所四名成员在家庭法...
案例选例 民事 2024 年 3 月 30 日
柏承的林国辉大律师及陈芷蓉大律师...
民事 最新消息 2023 年 11 月 17 日
柏承大律师事务所荣登2024年度...