陳芷蓉

認許 2014(香港)
語言 英文 , 粵語 , 普通話 , 西班牙語
'Lareina is a very thorough and tough barrister. She is not afraid of fighting hard for clients in court and trying out some of the more challenging and creative arguments.'
2025年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單
'Lareina is a person who looks into the details of each and every fact of the case and she is good at meeting the tight deadlines of demanding clients. The quality of her work has improved a lot over the years and her native English has made her stand out when she makes submissions in court.'
2024年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單

陳芷蓉

認許
2014(香港)
語言
英文 , 粵語 , 普通話 , 西班牙語
'Lareina is a very thorough and tough barrister. She is not afraid of fighting hard for clients in court and trying out some of the more challenging and creative arguments.'
2025年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單
'Lareina is a person who looks into the details of each and every fact of the case and she is good at meeting the tight deadlines of demanding clients. The quality of her work has improved a lot over the years and her native English has made her stand out when she makes submissions in court.'
2024年《法律500強》指南香港大律師榜單

簡介

陳大律師就家事婚姻法,民事法和白領罪案都有很強的專業經驗。她曾以訟辯大律師身份,單獨或作為次席大律師,在上訴庭、原訟庭、區域法院或家事法庭以及裁判法院進行訟辯。

陳大律師在婚姻及家事訟辯各方面都有豐富的經驗。她亦經常在家事財產申索事宜和子女爭議事項作出廣泛和實用的法律意見,這包括附屬濟助訴訟程序(涵蓋虛擬貨幣),第三者權益,改變居留地的申請,就子女的撫養/照顧及管教的安排,強制行動及初級偵訊等等。

從2017年開始,陳大律師成為香港家庭法律協會(HKFLA)的執行委員會的成員。她亦是香港大律師公會家事法專業委員會的成員。

陳大律師亦有幸被2024年度Legal 500《法律500強》視為在家事法及個體客戶事項其中一名傑出的次席大律師。

在其他民事法的範疇中,陳大律師有其認可的經驗,特別在涉及私人客戶的事項,她就廣泛的法律議題提供意見,這包括精神健康程序,遺囑及遺產管理,知識產權,涉及虛擬貨幣/比特幣的案件,醫療疏忽,土地法,公司股權紛爭及其他涉及公司和商務事宜。

在刑事案件中,陳大律師亦處理不少複雜的白領罪案,包括涉及証劵及期貨事務監察委員會(SFC),廉政公署(ICAC),金融科技(FinTech)及虛擬貨幣財務罪行的案件。

在其他範疇,陳大律師除間中在香港大學輔導班授課外,她亦是香港訟辯培訓學會(HKATC)其中一名訟辯督導員,負責見習大律師的訟辯培訓。

案件選例
  • MMP v. MMGA (FCMC 751/2018) – 10-day ancillary relief Trial in a long marriage of approx. 22 years involving assets of around HK$1.1 billion, add-backs in relation to ~US$4.5 million (~HK$35 million) in marital assets transferred to a girlfriend/new partner, serious illnesses suffered by both children requiring significant medical expenses / medical insurance and specialist treatment, including arguments as to post-separation accruals, conduct (marital, financial and litigation conduct), adverse inferences from financial disclosure, redaction of documents, relevant dates of valuations of assets, co-mingling of assets, liquidity / illiquidity of assets and undisclosed significant investments post-Trial.
  • RPB (nee RGP) v. CFB (FCMC 13240/2019) – 5-day ancillary relief Trial with an interlocutory litigation funding application in the context of assets in the Philippines and Texas, USA, including arguments as to ringfencing pre-marital assets, post-separation / non-matrimonial assets, liquidity / illiquidity of assets, a discount for lack of marketability of assets, passive economic growth / passive income on investments and a discount for minority interests, in the context of inter alia a US Qualified Domestic Relations Order to a US 401(k) pension, US tax SJE evidence, SJE evidence from a Philippines lawyer, a minority interest in an LLC which owns a plot of land, a 50% share in a plot of land purchased using inheritance monies, inherited investment accounts.
  • LSN v. LCM (FCMC 3810/2021) – ancillary relief application involving volatile crypto-assets representing a significant proportion of the matrimonial assets (at one point as high as 70%, with a then-valuation of over HK$13 million) and other investments in stocks/shares and options including arguments as to valuations of cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets, the relevant dates of valuations, varying risk appetites, financial disclosure and adverse inferences.
  • DAP v. WPYC (FCMP 167/2020) – 4-day Trial on children matters in relation to a child born out of wedlock, under the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap 13), including SJE evidence from a Child Psychologist on inter alia access and overnight access, an urgent variation/stay application, the introduction of a new partner (and subsequent marriage) to the child, and principles as to access arrangements for young children, infants and toddlers.
  • LYYC v. CHL and CSMS, the Executrices of the Estate of CGSK also known as CSKG, Deceased (HCMP 683/2021) [2022] HKCFI 1431 – resisting an application in the context of litigation funding under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance (Cap 481), including arguments as to the distinction between section 3 of the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (Cap 192) and section 7 of Cap 481, res judicata and interim lump sum orders.
  • WLK by her next friend MYW v. CCIW & Ors. (FCMP 176/2019) – application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance (Cap 481) by the Applicant mother who is a mentally-incapacitated person, including a litigation funding application, against her 10 children in relation to the estate of their deceased father / the Applicant’s late husband.
  • CK v. ZH (FCMP 8/2023) – successful urgent injunction application with an authorisation of arrest pursuant to the Domestic and Cohabitation Relationships Violence Ordinance (Cap 189) against the mother/grandmother of the Applicant, and subsequent arrest due to a breach of the Injunction Order.
  • IS v. BLL (FCMP 98/2023) – in relation to an intended relocation to South Africa and/or permission to continue to reside in Hong Kong, parallel proceedings in New York, including arguments as to jurisdiction and forum non conveniens.
  • CWK v. LYW (FCMC 2019/2023) – urgent application for variation / suspension of access, return of the parties’ child and allegations of child abuse.
案件選例
  • Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Health Ltd. & Reckitt Benckiser Hong Kong v. WHealthfields (Hong Kong) Ltd. (HCIP 2/2022) – resisting an application for summary judgment in the context of Dettol and Walch hygiene products / fast-moving consumer goods, in the context of a claim for copyright infringement and passing off.
  • K11 Group Limited & Ors v. Ouji Sekken (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. (HCIP 73/2022) – resisting a claim of passing off by the K11 Group / K11 MUSEA, a subsidiary of the New World Development Group, in the context of body wash products sold under the “KHO” brand.

2013

香港大學法學專業證書

2012

香港大學法學士

  • 陳大律師亦有幸被2024年度Legal 500 《法律500強》視為在家事法及個體客戶事項其中一名傑出的大律師。 

  • 香港大學法律專業學系法學專業證書民事訟辯講師(小組導修)(2019至今)
  • 香港大律師公會家事法委員會委員(2019年3月至今)
  • 香港大律師公會法律教育及專業進修常委會委員(2019年3月至今)
  • 香港女律師協會成員(2018年11月至今)
  • 香港大律師公會執業發展常委會委員(2018年6月至今)
  • Hong Kong Advocacy Training Council 訟辯導師(2018年1月至今)
  • 香港家庭法律協會執行委員會成員(2017年11月至今)(自2015為成員)
  • 香港大律師公會新晉大律師常委會副主蓆(2017年3月至2019年2月)
  • 香港大律師公會新晉大律師常委會秘書(2016年3月至2017年3月)
  • 香港大律師公會執委會委員(譚允芝資深大律師為主蓆)(2016年1月至2017年1月)
  • 香港大律師公會持續專業發展工作小組成員(2015年10月至2017年1月)
  • 香港大律師公會行為守則及註冊外地律師於香港提供法律意見及執業工作小組成員(2015年10月至2017年1月)
  • Hong Kong Competition Association成員(2015至今)
  • Middle Temple Society in Hong Kong 成員(2015至今)
  • 香港大律師公會福利及康體常委會委員(2015至2018)

  • Middle Temple訟辯培訓獎學金(英國倫敦)(2015)

  • 演講者,“不穩定且有風險的婚姻資產:應對價值波動和風險偏好變化的策略”,何敦律師行(2023 年 12 月 8 日)
  • 演講者,“家庭執法:除非命令”,古明慧律師行(2023 年 2 月 24 日)
  • 演講者,“跨境相互執行婚姻和家庭案件”,何韋律師行(2022 年 11 月 16 日)
  • 演講者,“婚姻訴訟中的加密貨幣和加密資產”,古明慧律師行(2022 年 6 月 24 日)
  • 特約作者,《Annotated Ordinances of Hong Kong-匯票條例》(第 19 章),LexisNexis(2022 年 9 月至今)
  • 演講者,“打破(區塊)鏈:離婚與加密資產”,思雅仕律師行和普華永道(2022 年 2 月 17 日)
  • 演講者,香港大律師公會家事法委員會“遠距聽證會與虛擬羅斯福”(2021年7月)
  • 演講者,香港大律師公會家事法委員會,“家庭法實務與程序:首次約見”(2019年9月)
  • 演講者,香港大律師公會家事法委員會“家事法程序:家庭暴力”(2019年6月)
  • 特約作者,LexisNexis 實用指南 – 私人客戶(附屬濟助)(2019 年 3 月至今)
  • 演講者,“可以直接延聘大律師就稅務問題提供法律意見嗎?大律師和稅務從業人員之間如何最好地合作?”(香港稅務學會主辦)(2018年12月)
  • 演講者,“具爭訟性的遺囑認證和遺產管理的熱門問題”(2017 年 9 月)
  • 演講者,“香港的眾籌及其監管:慣性空間?”2015年貿易法委員會新興會議(2017年8月發布)(2015年11月)

陳芷蓉更新

最新消息 2025 年 11 月 19 日
Latest Legal 500...
最新消息 2025 年 4 月 2 日
Latest DoyleR...
最新消息 2025 年 1 月 16 日
A strong showing...
案例選例 民事 2024 年 7 月 12 日
退休金,婚前地塊,及菲律賓物業:...
民事 最新消息 2024 年 5 月 3 日
柏承大律師事務所四名成員在家庭法...
案例選例 民事 2024 年 3 月 30 日
柏承的林國輝大律師及陳芷蓉大律師...
最新消息 2023 年 11 月 17 日
柏承大律師事務所榮登2024年度...